Optimizing performance from a water, steam, or gas flood depends
on:
Identifying uneven progression of the flood front through the
reservoir.
Injectant may move more rapidly through some parts of a
reservoir than others, creating an uneven flood front. Such
preferential movement of injectant through parts of the reservoir
may result in premature breakthrough of the injectant at some
producer wells. Uneven breakthrough can cause the loss or
"orphaning" of oil in bypassed sections of the reservoir, and
therefore can reduce ultimate oil recovery. Frequently, from data
on progression of a flood, injection rates can be modified in
certain areas so as to maintain an even flood front.
Oil geochemistry provides an inexpensive means for monitoring
the progression of a flood. In the case of steam or water floods of
heavy oil accumulations, changes in the composition of produced oil
over time can be used to identify the portions of the reservoir
being impacted by the flood, and to estimate the relative
production from discrete reservoir intervals (McCaffrey et al.,
1996).
In the case of a gas flood, compositional data for (i) the
injectant, (ii) the solution gas, and (iii) the produced gas can be
used in combination to assess the percentage of injected gas
present in produced gas.
Water
geochemistry also provides a means for monitoring the
progression of the flood front. If injected water and formation
water have different chemistries, then variations in produced water
chemistry can identify portions of the reservoir being impacted by
the flood (Okoro et al., 2000).
Minimizing formation damage caused by interaction of the
injectant with reservoir fluids and rock.
During either a miscible CO2 or hydrocarbon gas
flood, dissolution of injected gas into the oil may reduce the
solubility of asphaltenes and/or high-molecular-weight paraffins in
the oil, resulting in precipitation of these components in the
reservoir. By clogging pore throats, these organic precipitates may
reduce injectivity, adversely affecting the producibility of the
reservoir. This type of formation damage can be avoided by
conducting core flood experiments in the laboratory that assess the
affect of the injectant on the reservoired oil. If such experiments
identify significant risk for formation of organic precipitates,
then additional experiments can identify chemical modifiers that
can be added to the injectant to prevent formation of organic
precipitates by increasing the solubility of asphaltenes and/or
high-molecular-weight paraffins in the oil/gas solution (Hwang et
al., 1999).
During a waterflood, the injectant may react with reservoir
minerals and/or with reservoir brine and cause precipitation of
secondary minerals or swelling of clays that clog pore throats,
reducing injectivity. This type of formation damage can also be
predicted by considering in combination the compositions of the
injected water, the reservoir brine, and the reservoir
mineralogy.
For more information on the geochemical techniques described
here, or to discuss a specific project, e-mail us at info@oiltracers.com, or call
us at (214) 584-9169.
References
Hwang, R. J. and Ortiz J. (1999). Mitigation of asphaltics
deposition during CO2 flood. Abstracts 19th
International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry, Istanbul, Turkey,
Tubitak Marmara Research Center Earth Sciences Research Institute.
Vol. II: 601-602.
Okoro I.C., E. N. Olaniyan, J.O. Umurhohwo, B. A. Patterson, and
D. D. Kennedy, 2000, Potential Uses of Injected Sea Water as a
Tracer in Water Flood Management (abstract): Pennwell et al. ed.,
Offshore West Africa Conference, (Abidjan, Cote D'Ivoire,
3/21-3/23/2000).
McCaffrey M. A., Legarre H. A. and Johnson S. J. (1996). Using
biomarkers to improve heavy oil reservoir management: An example
from the Cymric field, Kern County, California. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 80(6),
904-919.